Skip to content

General

General

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

1241 results found

  1. Hi all,

    We send Firebase app invitations only to our company domain emails, but the invitation email can be forwarded and accepted by a personal Gmail account, which creates a security concern.

    Is there a way to:

    Restrict invitation acceptance to only the Google account that received the email

    Or limit access to company-domain Google accounts only

    Prevent forwarded invitations from granting access to unauthorized users

    Any best practices or Firebase-supported solutions would be appreciated. Thanks!

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Improve firestore rules debug info:
    2 features will really improve the debugging of firestore rules:
    - Add a "label" parameter to the debug() function to identify the result in the debug log file of the emulator. Right now, only the value is printed, it is very confusing when you have several debug calls...
    - Improve the error message returned to the client so we can understand the permission denied. Right now the message contains very little information and it is not helpful a all..,

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. There is a very annoying limitation in the Firestore rules: you cannot convert a Set() to a List().

    This prevents a lot of possibility especially when using Map().diff().affectedKeys(): there is no way to access the first element for example.

    My use case is the following:
    On my client side, I am incrementing the value of a map element, ie:
    MapFieldValue resources;
    resources["gold"] = FieldValue::Increment(-amount);

    And on the rules side, I want to ensure that the resulting value is always positive (ie you cannot spend more gold than you have, even concurrently!):

    let updatedKeys = (resource.data.diff(request.resource.data).affectedKeys());
    return (updatedKeys.size() == 1 &&…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Dear Sir, If I would that my project storage getting over 1gb . then it would be better. now the condition id that i have lost my world that I I made in this project. I cannot upgrade because my all card is not taking cor paying to get the blaze plan

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Additional to just a condition for allow read/write. I think firestore rule should be replaced with transform function. It should utilize pipeline operation and return document to read/write. So that it could force add field or change logic to generate some field on every document without redeploy client

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Deployment of apps in the firebase project has limited region options and middle east regions are not among them.

    Allowing the deployment of backend in these region will enable us to lower latency and use the cool firebase dashboards to manage the backend without having to go to GCP console often.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  App Hosting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. 8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  App Check  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Now for iphone 16 and iphone 17, analytics only detect it as iphone, marketing name is null.
    It is hard to analyze user's device distribution.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Given apphosting supports multiple configured backends, it would greatly improve the emulator's utility to provide a mechanism to emulate all of them locally. With this feature in place firebase can support local emulation of apphosting and cloud run backends configured using hosting rewrite rules when deployed, which is a big win for supporting any number of microservices behind a single domain for integration testing and local dev. We'll still be responsible for implementing a local service discovery mechanism, but we'll have the convenience of just the emulator for spawning all our app processes.

    From the outside the feature looks like…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  App Hosting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Custom Dom should instantly hook on the app hosting

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  App Hosting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. I always run my firebase projects as monorepos since they typically incorporate several distinct apps with shared deps. I use my own CI/CD pipeline because the apphosting default is not flexible enough.

    When deploying apphosting using the CLI, there is a size limit on the zipped bundle. If the "ignore" behavior would allow me to ignore directories from the project root I wouldn't have problems, but since it's relative to the apphosting "rootDir" I don't have a way to use my entire monorepo for integration testing, etc and then ship my apphosting project using firebase deploy because the entire monorepo…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  App Hosting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Blacklist scenario: Let's say that a device is detected for fraud/scam activity. I want to blacklist the device for 1 year based on the previously logged-in IP address, so the scammer is no longer able to use their devices. Even though the scammer created a new Firebase account, they won't be able to do that because of the IP address blacklist.

    Whitelist scenario: Let's say that I have an internal app. I want this app to be used by my employees only, so only specific devices are allowed to login.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. In many multi-tenant applications, an invitation is a time-limited, one-time handshake between two parties inside an app context (e.g. organization, workspace, team, or document).

    After the invitation email is accepted, the link should bring the recipient into the app at a specific contextual entry point (for example, a workspace, organization, or document reference). From that point:

    Existing users continue through the regular sign-in flow (if not already signed in)

    New users continue through the standard sign-up flow

    At that point, the application takes full control of the user experience and logic.

    From Firebase’s perspective, the responsibility would primarily be to…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Authentication  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Cannot create event on edge

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  App Check  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Idea save

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Authentication  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Fix the menu process flow for set-up - think like a user instead of a Nerd Progrmmer or enable Gemini to do some work for users

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Extensions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Türkçe dil desteği istiyoruz ugulamayı daha iyi kullanmak için yoksa silmeniz gerekecek

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Add optional session management to Firebase Authentication that creates and tracks individual login sessions per user, allowing developers/users to view active sessions with device and operating system information (derived from the User-Agent), approximate location (city/country), session creation time, and last active timestamp. The feature would enable per-device logout and selective session revocation via the Firebase Admin SDK, with optional read-only access for clients to build “logged-in devices” security UIs, while remaining privacy-safe, opt-in, and configurable without exposing raw IP addresses or User-Agent strings.

    View Complete Proposal/Request here: https://gist.github.com/12fahed/42e802890b5b887b93c66d94ceadeb2d

    42 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
1 2 … 6 8 10 … 62 63
  • Don't see your idea?