Skip to content

General

General

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

760 results found

  1. With multi-db support in Firestore now launched, this enabled a ton of new features, though the way permissions are granted is not ideal.

    --

    Instead of being able to attach permissions to individual databases, you have to use conditional IAM permissions on a project level.

    --

    This leads to problems when you want to grant IAM permissions to employees with access to only a subset of databases.
    Granting a subset of databases to access will prevent them from using the Firebase / Google Cloud console, as they will not have permission to view all databases.

    --

    Also conditional IAM permissions…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. MANY MICROSOFT AND GOOGLE USER DOESNT KNOW THAT THEIR SYCN EMAIL BECOME A TRACER FOR HACKER (WITH ORGANIZATION AND COMPANY) TO GET THEIR FINANCIAL INFORMATION. WHY THIS APP DEV DOESN'T PROTECT USER PRIVACY?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. In Firestore rule, it could be very powerful to convert String containing date to Timestamp. For example, the RevenueCat extension store date as ISO 8601 string and we can't use them in firestore rule because date are not Timestamp.

    In my Firestore rule, I would like to do something like :

    timestamp.parse(collection.data.expires_date) > request.time

    22 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. nativePollOnce should be excluded from ANR in Firebase

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Crashlytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Currently, sending email verification is done through the client-side sdk. There is no method (to my knowledge) for sending email verification via the Admin SDK in a server environment.

    The only workaround seems to be the "generateEmailVerificationLink" function but that requires the use of a custom email service. This is different from the client-sdk functionality.

    The use case is SSR focused apps where user creation is also done via the Admin SDK and/or where support for no-js availability is a requirement.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Authentication  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. I believe that by simply allowing access to the whereArrayContains filter value, it should be possible to solve for a use-case which can generally only be resolved using an SQL/relational database or cloud functions.

    Take the following query;

          getDocs(
            query(
              collection(db, "profiles"),
              where("groupProfileLinkIdReference", "array-contains", "groupProfileLinkId1"),
              limit(1),
            ),
          )
    

    If we can access the value which in this case is "groupProfileLinkId1", it becomes possible to do the following;

    match /profiles/{profileId} {
          allow list: if validateListProfileDbEntry();
    }
    
    function validateListProfileDbEntry(){
      let groupProfileLinkId = resource.data.groupProfileLinkIdReference[0];
      let groupProfileLink = get(/databases/$(database)/documents/groupProfileLink/$(groupProfileLinkId)).data;
    
    
      return groupProfileLink.isApproved == true;
    }
    
    

    The way the data is modelled is that every time…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. The Firestore requests page in the emulator currently sorts the requests by ascending execution time, which requires to scroll to the very bottom every time to see the last request. Very cumbersome.

    The emulator should order by default by descending order and also offer a "clear" button to empty the list upon request.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Emulators  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. The newest iPhone model and iOS version available to run in Test Lab is an iPhone 14 Pro running iOS 16.6. With iOS 18 recently released, it would be great to have support for newer devices (iPhone 15 and 16 models) running the newest iOS versions (17.x and 18.x).

    38 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Test Lab  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. My company develops and markets a BLE-connected device for stress management. The device is controlled by our Android and iOS apps.

    I would REALLY, REALLY, REALLY, REALLY love to have a way to test the interaction between different API levels and smartphones and our device, both for Android and iOS. Lack of this is really the Achilles'heel of any Test Lab - style automated testing facility, and if this feature does not work properly, any bug on the rest of the app does not matter.

    I have been thinking of mocking the device via an ESP32 or Raspberry Pi running…

    15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Test Lab  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. 我在Google开发者平台提交技术支持抛出"Error submitting request. Please try again later."错误,致使我无法寻求帮助。我不知道为什么会这样.....

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  In-App Messaging  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Currently the latest stable or other stable Gemini 1.5 models are available only (see https://firebase.google.com/docs/vertex-ai/gemini-models#available-model-names). These lag behind with features such as function calling ability (performance), structured output (according to the feature matrix Gemini 1.5 Flash does not support that but we know it has multiple versions already capable of). Why cannot we access the preview model we'd like?

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. support all flutter supported platforms

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Crashlytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. In firebase remote config you can have a multi-line string (ie have new lines), but as far as I can tell this isn't possible when setting up the variant in an A/B test this means we can't make small A/B test changes to multi-line text

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Remote Config  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Hi Team,
    We are supporting our services in Sudan also, but the country is not listed in remote config country list.
    How to provide country specific config to Sudan?

    Thanks & Regards,
    Ram

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. It's incredible how complex you made Firebase, because of the link with Google Cloud. Firebase used to be an easy solution, but it's all soo overly complex that I don't trust any of it.

    Maybe I will suddenly get a large bill because I made a mistake, or the configuration is bad. It's really annoying. Your service has gone from an easy to use cloud solution to a complete mess of configuration annoyances, security angst, complex issues.

    The documentation is overly complex. You loop around in al the options. And everything refers to Google Cloud again.

    Nothing is easy with…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. For security, I would like to be able to completely disable functions in my account. So nothing can be done without an extra authentication (e.g. admin password).

    This to prevent large bills due to errors in the software or due to bad actors. Especially since this whole Google Cloud is completely connected to Firebase, the risk of a mistake or a bad actor is higher

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Firebase console  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. I saw this on the documentation website: "Note: The limits for email link sign-in emails were recently changed. Please add a billing instrument to go beyond 5 email link sign-in emails."

    It's really strange that you quietly set the limit of sign-in emails to 5. Why? It makes no sense. For testing it's too low, and for production of course.

    First you hook developers up to Firebase and then you quietly lower the limits. Good business practices.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Authentication  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Cloud Messaging  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. please support me

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  App Hosting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. OrderBy should be able to return collection item when target property is null.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?