Skip to content

General

General

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

757 results found

  1. Does anyone know why Firebase doesn't support notification delivery on iOS? This is supported by other messaging frameworks such as OneSignal by hooking into Notification Service Extensions.

    Firebase does have a FIRMessagingExtensionHelper class which has an exportDeliveryMetricsToBigQuery method — however I didn't see references to this in the docs, how it should be used, or whether it suits my needs.

    The ideal scenario is that Firebase can just report iOS delivery rates in the console. It's confusing to me why this is not made simple, and if anyone has some insight here it would be much appreciated.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Cloud Messaging  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Allow users opening the Download link for a Firebase App Distribution Release to access and download the app file through desktop browsers instead of arbitrarily blocking it.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Allow a Download link for a build uploaded to Firebase App Distribution to be opened and the file downloaded on a desktop machine instead of only mobile devices, allowing the sharing of apps with third parties that cannot access email or google accounts on the target devices. It's the same basic functionality that already exists, simply allowed on desktop as well instead of arbitrarily blocked.

    Given the nearly ubiquitous presence of this as an option with other app distributors, it's somewhat shocking this wasn't already an option.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  App Distribution  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. The way that Firebase helps developers quickly setup OAuth providers is amazing, but it would be really helpful if there were more providers to choose from. I'm sure you could do it if you set things up yourself, but making it easier to use services like LinkedIn would be really helpful.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Authentication  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Introduce a request.query.parameters object to store key-value pairs from the query payload, enabling conditional access control based on user authentication state.

    Current workarounds, like nesting documents in sub-collections, restrict uniqueness to a single field. This proposal allows queries to be filtered dynamically based on multiple conditions.

    For example, access can be restricted based on user authentication state or location.

    if request.query.parameters.user == request.auth.uid
    if request.query.parameters.location == request.auth.token.region
    if request.query.parameters.email != null
    if request.query.parameters.email == request.auth.email
    

    Privileged searches can be enabled with conditions such as:

    if request.query.parameters.key == request.auth.token.vipkey
    

    Range queries can be implemented using a function object to validate if…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Dear product manager, Gemini in Firebase is far from a good and useful product compared to the competition. The usability really sucks yet, however you're already trying to sell a subscription of it.

    Firebase sounds awesome and I'm making some trials. But make a decision:

    Or you try to sell Firebase making it really easy to test and conclude projects using AI with trully integrated Gemini with great workflow usability to built Apps and write code or you try to sell general Gemini subscription here. Other AIs are bringing better results to develop Firebase solutions.

    I'm not buying an early…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. প্রথম ডিপোজিটে ১০%পার্সেন্ট বোনাস

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  App Check  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Currently you have to give users/principles the Owner Role to add or delete APNs Authentication keys. We work to Principle of Least Privilege, and would like to have a subset of our user group to have this privilege. Can we get either a firebase role created to allow this functionality or dedicated permissions so we can add to a custom role.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Cloud Messaging  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. I like the idea that you can use Cloud Secret Manager to store and encrypt the secrets within the app.

    Coming from using .env files in Next.js and Vercel hosting could this process be made simpler e.g. reading the .env file from your app directly and intelligently placing the key/value pairs in the apphosting.yaml file or the rollout during creation.

    This would be good to keep things simple and straight forward.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  App Hosting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. I would like to be able to add multiple configurations to experiment a/b at once that have been previously selected or marked. Or create an experiment based on multiple selected configurations.
    Right now, if you add configurations manually, you have to do it one at a time.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. full support for KMM android, web, ios and desktop.
    What is the point of not supporting all of these?

    we build the best car but you can only use one wheel. Not a great theory for adoption.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Authentication  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. As of this writing, our only option for Database location is US Central, Belgium and Southeast Asia. Having a new region under Australia would be great.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Remember sort order for remote config view so you don't have to change the sort every time the console page is refreshed.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Remote Config  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Play store

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Is there a plan to disable support for TLS 1.0 and 1.0 version across the domains e.g. firebase console, fcm.googleapis.com and other services?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. This is a problem I have encountered while using Firebase with Swift. I want to be able to prompt the user to sign up if they do not have an account. However, the error returned from Auth.auth().signIn(withEmail, password) is the same if the user enters the wrong password or an email the doesn't exist. If the errors were different I would be able to show the sign up prompt only if that specific error is thrown.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Authentication  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Please do kindly consider changing the button name from "Get Started" more specifically to "Create Firebase Storage" within Firebase console. One gets the impression via "Get Started" that the user is in for marketing fluff than actual and crucial utility. Thank you.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Firebase Functions don't seem to be well supported in App Hosting. At least if you are using Typescript in the functions, the deploy process runs into an error in the build step. It seems to be because "npm run build" runs Typescript checking everywhere, and the dependencies in functions/package.json haven't been installed.

    A user on Stack Overflow who asked about this ended up working around it by setting tsconfig.json to ignore the functions directory. They also have to do a manual deploy of the functions, because apparently the App Hosting deploy process doesn't do it.

    Ideally everything should just work;…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  App Hosting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Reorder the tabs in Realtime DB to prioritize displaying the rules or a landing page before the data.

    New users and analytics management find that loading the Realtime Database section from the web console impacts bandwidth usage for reads. This behavior is not ideal and could be separated from the Realtime Database landing page, especially when editing or inspecting the rules, as it requires loading larger chunks of the database before the user switches tabs.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1 3 4 5 37 38
  • Don't see your idea?