1236 results found

1. We want the code editor to be free for everyone.

   If it was free for everyone, we would be able to create beautiful and different projects, and the subscription should only be on Fire, or data storage, or Google's digital cloud. The code editor should not have a monthly subscription. It should be free for everyone, and this is the meaning of technology, that the basis should be free, but the dependencies should be paid. If it is necessary, for example, a free artificial intelligence model should be placed for the code editor, and also make it paid. But the code editor should be free for everyone, and this is an idea that will help everyone, and other than that, it will build a very huge community.

   If it was free for everyone, we would be able to create beautiful and different projects, and the subscription should only be on Fire, or data storage, or Google's digital cloud. The code editor should not have a monthly subscription. It should be free for everyone, and this is the meaning of technology, that the basis should be free, but the dependencies should be paid. If it is necessary, for example, a free artificial intelligence model should be placed for the code editor, and also make it paid. But the code editor should be free for everyone, and this is… more

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Analytics  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. PERSIST FIRESTORE COLLECTION SORTING CONDITIONS
   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   2 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Fix error messages when deploying Functions

   Several error messages often occur when deploying Firebase Cloud Functions that should not occur. My first time attempting to deploy functions in a new project, I got:

   i extensions: ensuring required API firebaseextensions.googleapis.com is enabled...
   ⚠ extensions: missing required API firebaseextensions.googleapis.com. Enabling now...

   Error: Request to https://serviceusage.googleapis.com/v1/projects/********/services/firebaseextensions.googleapis.com had HTTP Error: 429, Quota exceeded for quota metric 'Default requests' and limit 'Default requests per minute' of service 'serviceusage.googleapis.com' for consumer 'project_number:********'.

   I don't know if that happens every time. It appears to be just a failure to wait long enough after enabling the API.

   The second time, it got further, but errored again:

   ⚠ functions: missing required API eventarc.googleapis.com. Enabling now...
   ✔ functions: required API pubsub.googleapis.com is enabled
   ✔ functions: required API storage.googleapis.com is enabled
   ✔ functions: required API run.googleapis.com is enabled
   ✔ functions: required API eventarc.googleapis.com is enabled
   i functions: generating the service identity for pubsub.googleapis.com...
   i functions: generating the service identity for eventarc.googleapis.com...
   ✔ functions: functions folder uploaded successfully
   i functions: creating Node.js 22 (2nd Gen) function onMessageCreated(us-central1)...
   ⚠ functions: Request to https://cloudfunctions.googleapis.com/v2/projects/********/locations/us-central1/functions?functionId=onMessageCreated had HTTP Error: 400, Validation failed for trigger projects/*****/locations/us-central1/triggers/onmessagecreated-119882: Invalid resource state for "": Permission denied while using the Eventarc Service Agent. If you recently started to use Eventarc, it may take a few minutes before all necessary permissions are propagated to the Service Agent. Otherwise, verify that it has Eventarc Service Agent role.
   ⚠ functions: Since this is your first time using 2nd gen functions, we need a little bit longer to finish setting everything up. Retry the deployment in a few minutes.
   ⚠ functions: failed to create function projects/**/locations/us-central1/functions/onMessageCreated
   Failed to create function projects/*****/locations/us-central1/functions/onMessageCreated

   Functions deploy had errors with the following functions:
   onMessageCreated(us-central1)
   i functions: cleaning up build files...
   ⚠ functions: Unhandled error cleaning up build images. This could result in a small monthly bill if not corrected. You can attempt to delete these images by redeploying or you can delete them manually at https://console.cloud.google.com/gcr/images/********/us/gcf

   Error: There was an error deploying functions

   Again, it appears to be a timeout issue.

   Subsequent deploys have been successful, but I get this warning every time:

   ⚠ functions: Unhandled error cleaning up build images. This could result in a small monthly bill if not corrected. You can attempt to delete these images by redeploying or you can delete them manually at https://console.cloud.google.com/gcr/images/********/us/gcf

   That implies there may be a storage leak happening on every deploy.

   None of these errors should be happening, as far as I can tell.

   Several error messages often occur when deploying Firebase Cloud Functions that should not occur. My first time attempting to deploy functions in a new project, I got:

   i extensions: ensuring required API firebaseextensions.googleapis.com is enabled...
   ⚠ extensions: missing required API firebaseextensions.googleapis.com. Enabling now...

   Error: Request to https://serviceusage.googleapis.com/v1/projects/********/services/firebaseextensions.googleapis.com had HTTP Error: 429, Quota exceeded for quota metric 'Default requests' and limit 'Default requests per minute' of service 'serviceusage.googleapis.com' for consumer 'project_number:********'.

   I don't know if that happens every time. It appears to be just a failure to wait long enough after enabling the API.

   The second time, it got further, but… more

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Cloud Functions for Firebase  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Add Q&A about including Firebase Analytics in a library to be used by arbitrary 3rd party apps

   It seems it is not recommended or possible, but I lack an official answer:

   https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60076980/how-to-add-firebase-analytics-in-a-library

   https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38790977/include-firebase-analytics-in-library?noredirect=1&lq=1

   https://www.reddit.com/r/androiddev/comments/fpxna8/firebase_analytics_in_android_library/?rdt=40331

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. messaging reports you can select by year also so if you want to do a summary of 2024 example you can have access

   messaging reports you can select by year also so if you want to do a summary of 2024 example you can have access

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   2 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Support .NET (C#) in Firebase Functions.

   Firebase has .NET SDKs for the client and admin SDKS. It would be nice if Firebase Functions supported .NET (C#) especially since GCP Cloud Run Functions already support .NET.

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Cloud Functions for Firebase  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Anything Required for Upcoming APNs Certificate Update

   Dear Firebase Support Team,

   I hope you are doing well.
   We recently received a notification from Apple regarding the upcoming Apple Push Notification service (APNs) server certificate update. As per Apple's update:
   Sandbox APNs certificates were updated on January 21, 2025.
   Production APNs certificates will be updated on February 24, 2025.
   We are currently using Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM) to send push notifications to our iOS app (<com.datamyte.digitalclipboard>).

   As of now everything working as expected, we would like to confirm:
   Does Firebase automatically support these APNs certificate updates, or is any action required from our side to ensure continued push notification delivery?
   We appreciate your guidance on this matter to ensure a smooth transition without notification disruptions.
   Looking forward to your response.

   Best regards,
   Digital Clipboard

   Dear Firebase Support Team,

   I hope you are doing well.
   We recently received a notification from Apple regarding the upcoming Apple Push Notification service (APNs) server certificate update. As per Apple's update:
   Sandbox APNs certificates were updated on January 21, 2025.
   Production APNs certificates will be updated on February 24, 2025.
   We are currently using Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM) to send push notifications to our iOS app (<com.datamyte.digitalclipboard>).

   As of now everything working as expected, we would like to confirm:
   Does Firebase automatically support these APNs certificate updates, or is any action required from our side to ensure continued push… more

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Cloud Messaging  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Stability score

   Currently firebase crashlytics shows crash free users and crash free sessions, although ANRs are also equally important. ANRs create a bad user experience which is comparable to a crash.

   By showing a stability score which considers ANRs as well as crashes, we can show a true representation of app health. This can be at the session level.

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Crashlytics  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Enable source map support

   Since Node 12 it has built-in source map support. For cloud run deployments we can start the node server with the flag --enable-source-maps, but for cloud functions we don't have this control.

   I don't understand why we still need to install and register the source-map-support NPM package in our code to get source maps to work.

   I suggest to have a configuration option that enables the flag, preventing us from having to manually install a package that is considered obsolete for newer versions of Node.

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Cloud Functions for Firebase  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. notes

    Add Crashlytics Issue Notes to the Crashlytics Schema [1] for BigQuery Export [2]

    [1] https://firebase.google.com/docs/crashlytics/bigquery-export#schema-columns
    [2] https://firebase.google.com/docs/crashlytics/bigquery-export

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Crashlytics  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Automatic Deployment of Changed Firebase Functions

    Firebase should offer a built-in feature to automatically detect changes to Cloud Functions and deploy only those functions, grouped into manageable batches to avoid rate limits. This feature would streamline deployments by:

    • Scanning the project directory to identify functions with modified code since the last deployment.
    • Automatically batching the deployment of changed functions based on rate limit thresholds (e.g., 8-10 functions per batch).
    • Handling the deployment process transparently within the Firebase CLI or CI/CD integrations, reducing manual intervention.

    This functionality would save time, minimize deployment errors, and improve developer workflows, particularly in large projects with numerous functions.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Cloud Functions for Firebase  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Crashlytics Velocity alerts should contain impacted user count

    We would like to have Crashlytics Velocity alerts contain the impacted user count so we can determine how problematic a velocity alert actually is.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Crashlytics  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. deberian permitir hacer un proyecto gratis

    En mi caso queria hacer en ejemplo con los alumnos y me quiere cambiar de spark a blaze sin haberlo probado siquiera

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Firebase console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Daily usage limitation chart

    We were keep getting the Firestore Quota message tough the usage was just 2% in our billing.
    After reaching out to the Firebase team, we found out that there are also daily limitations for each action (Read, Write,..) that was hidden in google cloud console.

    The suggestion is to make the daily limitation chart visible in Firebase, as this error is effecting the users directly.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Suggestion for Enhanced Authentication Flow in Firebase Authentication

    Dear Firebase Support Team,

    I hope this message finds you well. I am reaching out to share a suggestion that I believe could greatly benefit Firebase Authentication and developers working on more complex applications.

    Currently, Firebase Authentication provides excellent flexibility with signInWithPhoneNumber and createUserWithEmailAndPassword, allowing projects to authenticate users using either a phone number or an email/password combination. However, in certain projects, both the phone number and email/password are essential to meet higher security standards and user profile requirements.

    In these cases, having an integrated authentication flow that combines signInWithPhoneNumber and createUserWithEmailAndPassword within a single, cohesive process would be highly valuable. This would allow developers to:

    Verify both Phone Number and Email in one seamless flow, ensuring that both contact methods are valid.
    Enhance Security and User Experience by allowing users to use either their phone number or email for future logins, while maintaining a smooth registration process.
    Create a More Complete User Profile right from the start, which is especially useful for applications that require strong user verification for sensitive data or financial transactions.
    Currently, implementing both methods within the same authentication process involves a multi-step workaround that can complicate the onboarding experience. A built-in support mechanism from Firebase could simplify this flow for developers and improve the overall user experience.

    I hope this suggestion resonates with your team and aligns with Firebase’s mission to provide developers with powerful, user-friendly tools. I would be thrilled to see this feature implemented in a future release.

    Thank you for considering this idea, and please let me know if I can provide any additional details.

    Best regards,

    Nicolas N'DAH

    Dear Firebase Support Team,

    I hope this message finds you well. I am reaching out to share a suggestion that I believe could greatly benefit Firebase Authentication and developers working on more complex applications.

    Currently, Firebase Authentication provides excellent flexibility with signInWithPhoneNumber and createUserWithEmailAndPassword, allowing projects to authenticate users using either a phone number or an email/password combination. However, in certain projects, both the phone number and email/password are essential to meet higher security standards and user profile requirements.

    In these cases, having an integrated authentication flow that combines signInWithPhoneNumber and createUserWithEmailAndPassword within a single, cohesive process would be highly… more

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Authentication  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. VENDORS and Developer illegal claims of software

    AAll Windows, PS4, PS5, XONE, XSXS online cost for play online games are starting at $10 up to 200 . The cost per hour online will cost 5 and hour. Where counting down the amount of hour children are allowed to play or Regulating these Councils because you don't learn anything from these game . We planning on adding a military testing 2 player shooting mode online for Educational purposes. These Simulator are binary military development platforms that civilian that unlisted one year in basic training get use those Simulator for team training Exercise . Cost for Devops package will go out to development community hackerone community and acme can marge together to split the testing . My name is warith akbar lead and owner of this package. Goal is to make military package build that can marry to are armed forces as at base or home live Sim location target Send my later simulators

    AAll Windows, PS4, PS5, XONE, XSXS online cost for play online games are starting at $10 up to 200 . The cost per hour online will cost 5 and hour. Where counting down the amount of hour children are allowed to play or Regulating these Councils because you don't learn anything from these game . We planning on adding a military testing 2 player shooting mode online for Educational purposes. These Simulator are binary military development platforms that civilian that unlisted one year in basic training get use those Simulator for team training Exercise . Cost for Devops package will… more

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Hosting  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. SSO accross subdomains
    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Authentication  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. doesn't deprecate Firebase Dynamic Links and separately charge for the feature as part of the Blaze plan.

    Firebase Dynamic Links are slated to be fully removed by Aug, 2025 but it is such a wonderful feature and I am not sure why is it removed from Firebase suite. I am willing to pay for it and I am sure there are many other users willing to pay for it.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Crashlytics Section should have User perceived ANR Filter

    There are lot of ANR like https://github.com/firebase/firebase-android-sdk/issues/6147#issuecomment-2417385067

    Which has no solution even Firebase team concluded that.
    So, there should be a filter to segregate user perceived ANRs on crashlytics.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Crashlytics  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Improve RemoteConfig conditions documentation

    Documentation about conditions for iOS and Android is lacking proper description for semver logic on parameter 'AppVersion'

    It seems that the condition properly evaluate operators
    >
>=
<
<=
    when the app version is a semver string i.e. 1.18.10 > 1.18.2

    but the documentation states that above operators are only working with numeric values :

    "...
    For string values:
    exactly matches,
    contains,
    does not contain,
    contains regex

    For numeric values:
    <, <=, =, !=, >, >=
    ..."

    The logic behind semver is very important and specific.
    To use it safetly we really need to be sure that the comparison is implemented as intended and documentation should describe it properly the implementation details.

    We really need semver comparison, otherwise simple matching on string is not useful to provide conditions based on AppVersion.
    At the same time we don't want to use because it works now with the risk it may change in the future because is not described in the docs.

    Please describe if the semver is implemented as intended to clear doubts.

    🙏

    Documentation about conditions for iOS and Android is lacking proper description for semver logic on parameter 'AppVersion'

    It seems that the condition properly evaluate operators
    >
>=
<
<=
    when the app version is a semver string i.e. 1.18.10 > 1.18.2

    but the documentation states that above operators are only working with numeric values :

    "...
    For string values:
    exactly matches,
    contains,
    does not contain,
    contains regex

    For numeric values:
    <, <=, =, !=, >, >=
    ..."

    The logic behind semver is very important and specific.
    To use it safetly we really need to be sure that the comparison is… more

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Remote Config  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating