1238 results found

1. Support backend modification or deletion options

   Currently, we can create backends, but there is no option to modify imported GitHub repositories. If making such modifications isn't possible, it would be beneficial to at least have the option to delete the backend.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  App Hosting  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Support UUID as a data type

   I'm using Go client, and at this time UUIDs are represented as array of numbers. This doesn't make any sense and is quite clunky and unergonomic, but this is the client behaviour - the Go type [16]byte converts to that, and there is no way to affect it directly.

   This also means that a list of UUIDs is impossible to represent at all, since a Go slice converts into an array, and Firestore can't handle arrays in arrays. Btw, that by itself is ridiculous, but right now my problem is with UUIDs specifically.

   A list of IDs is a trivial use case and I would imagine quite common, and I'm confused as to why this supposedly mature product is not designed to handle it. It has a special data type for Lat/Lon, but not for UUIDs, really?

   I'm using Go client, and at this time UUIDs are represented as array of numbers. This doesn't make any sense and is quite clunky and unergonomic, but this is the client behaviour - the Go type [16]byte converts to that, and there is no way to affect it directly.

   This also means that a list of UUIDs is impossible to represent at all, since a Go slice converts into an array, and Firestore can't handle arrays in arrays. Btw, that by itself is ridiculous, but right now my problem is with UUIDs specifically.

   A list of IDs is a trivial… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Firestore  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Allow cross-project restoring of Firestore databases

   When working with Firestore databases, you may want to restore an entire database for testing in your stage project.

   However, currently, you can only restore in the same project

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Unique password option for password policy

   Add an option for the password policy to require users to create a new, unique password that has never been used for their accounts.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Authentication  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Working perfectly fine

   Excellent

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. rules map

   In Firebase Firestore rules, we currently have various controls and functions, which are very handy. However, array management is not optimal. I propose introducing a map function for arrays in Firebase Firestore rules. This function would allow us to map arrays of objects, significantly simplifying the creation and management of rules.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Allow to assign tags to Firestore databases

   With multi-db support in Firestore now launched, this enabled many possibilities but also requires more granular inventory management of the databases created.

   --

   For compliance reasons and for better management of your cloud assets, it's important to assign metadata to your cloud resources.
   Especially for storage services, this is important, as it allows you to track which resources contain PII, who owns them, etc.

   --

   Attaching this kind of data is typically done using tags in Google Cloud.
   If it would be possible to attach tags to individual Firestore databases, this would solve the management of databases and allow easier compliance management.

   --

   For example, it could allow your compliance automation software (like Vanta or Drata) to extract that information directly from Google Cloud while allowing your engineers to define those labels right where they provision the database.

   With multi-db support in Firestore now launched, this enabled many possibilities but also requires more granular inventory management of the databases created.

   --

   For compliance reasons and for better management of your cloud assets, it's important to assign metadata to your cloud resources.
   Especially for storage services, this is important, as it allows you to track which resources contain PII, who owns them, etc.

   --

   Attaching this kind of data is typically done using tags in Google Cloud.
   If it would be possible to attach tags to individual Firestore databases, this would solve the management of databases and allow easier… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Allow to attach IAM permissions to databases

   With multi-db support in Firestore now launched, this enabled a ton of new features, though the way permissions are granted is not ideal.

   --

   Instead of being able to attach permissions to individual databases, you have to use conditional IAM permissions on a project level.

   --

   This leads to problems when you want to grant IAM permissions to employees with access to only a subset of databases.
   Granting a subset of databases to access will prevent them from using the Firebase / Google Cloud console, as they will not have permission to view all databases.

   --

   Also conditional IAM permissions are more complex to setup and maintain.

   --

   A better solution would be able to attach IAM permissions directly to the databases, like it's possible for storage buckets, Secret Manager secrets, BigQuery datasets and tables, etc.

   --

   If someone doesn't have permissions to view a Firestore database at all, it should be excluded from the list of databases in the consoles.
   If someone does have the permission to view a Firestore database, but does not have permission to view the data, it should be shown in the list of databases but then not load the data when going to the data tab of the database.

   With multi-db support in Firestore now launched, this enabled a ton of new features, though the way permissions are granted is not ideal.

   --

   Instead of being able to attach permissions to individual databases, you have to use conditional IAM permissions on a project level.

   --

   This leads to problems when you want to grant IAM permissions to employees with access to only a subset of databases.
   Granting a subset of databases to access will prevent them from using the Firebase / Google Cloud console, as they will not have permission to view all databases.

   --

   Also conditional IAM permissions… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. native

   nativePollOnce should be excluded from ANR in Firebase

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Crashlytics  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Allow use of the filter value on whereArrayContains within a firestore rule

    I believe that by simply allowing access to the whereArrayContains filter value, it should be possible to solve for a use-case which can generally only be resolved using an SQL/relational database or cloud functions.

    Take the following query;

          getDocs(
            query(
              collection(db, "profiles"),
              where("groupProfileLinkIdReference", "array-contains", "groupProfileLinkId1"),
              limit(1),
            ),
          )
    

    If we can access the value which in this case is "groupProfileLinkId1", it becomes possible to do the following;

    match /profiles/{profileId} {
          allow list: if validateListProfileDbEntry();
    }
    
    function validateListProfileDbEntry(){
      let groupProfileLinkId = resource.data.groupProfileLinkIdReference[0];
      let groupProfileLink = get(/databases/$(database)/documents/groupProfileLink/$(groupProfileLinkId)).data;
    
    
      return groupProfileLink.isApproved == true;
    }
    
    

    The way the data is modelled is that every time a new groupProfileLink is created for a profile the groupProfileLinkId is added to the profile's groupProfileLinkIdReference array field.

    Db summary;

    profiles
      - profileId1
        - id: "profileId1"
        - title: "someProfile"
        - groupProfileLinkIdReference: ["groupProfileLinkId1", "groupProfileLinkId2"]
        ...
    
    groupProfileLinks
      - groupProfileLinkId1
        - id: "groupProfileLinkId1"
        - groupId: "groupId1"
        - profileId: "profileId1"
    
    

    hopefully this makes sense - it really seems like it would unlock many new possibilities

    I believe that by simply allowing access to the whereArrayContains filter value, it should be possible to solve for a use-case which can generally only be resolved using an SQL/relational database or cloud functions.

    Take the following query;

          getDocs(
            query(
              collection(db, "profiles"),
              where("groupProfileLinkIdReference", "array-contains", "groupProfileLinkId1"),
              limit(1),
            ),
          )
    

    If we can access the value which in this case is "groupProfileLinkId1", it becomes possible to do the following;

    match /profiles/{profileId} {
          allow list: if validateListProfileDbEntry();
    }
    
    function validateListProfileDbEntry(){
      let groupProfileLinkId = resource.data.groupProfileLinkIdReference[0];
      let groupProfileLink = get(/databases/$(database)/documents/groupProfileLink/$(groupProfileLinkId)).data;
    
    
      return groupProfileLink.isApproved == true;
    }
    
    

    The way the data is modelled is that every time… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. 5 emails

    I saw this on the documentation website: "Note: The limits for email link sign-in emails were recently changed. Please add a billing instrument to go beyond 5 email link sign-in emails."

    It's really strange that you quietly set the limit of sign-in emails to 5. Why? It makes no sense. For testing it's too low, and for production of course.

    First you hook developers up to Firebase and then you quietly lower the limits. Good business practices.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Authentication  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. free

    please support me

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  App Hosting  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Orderby('any_potential_null_field', excludeNull: false) should exist

    OrderBy should be able to return collection item when target property is null.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Page not found

    I created a deeplink that opens in the in-app browser.
    Sometimes this deeplink works correctly for some users, while for others it does not. When it doesn't work, users are redirected to a Firebase error page (Page Not Found).

    I tried encoding the URL used as the Dynamic Link,
    but it still sometimes results in a Page Not Found error.

    The main issue is that the same Dynamic Link URL works for some users but not for others.
    What could be the cause of this?

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. support .guru domain extension

    I have a domain with the extension: .guru,
    but when I enter the domain to firebase for authentication, it doesn;t accept it as a valid domain name! HELP PLEASE!

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Authentication  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Substance clean energy
    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Connect (Data Connect)  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Firebase Setup infrastructure

    I'm creating an Open Source Cloud Native Platform based on Firebase. Every installation requires manual steps, to enable specific APIs.
    Please provide a configuration file where I can configure all required Google Cloud services (like Google Translate, Storage, Artifact Registry, etc ...).
    It will facilitate the automatic installation of Firebase applications.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Site Not Found

    i have deployed and when i try to go on default site i see site not found

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Hosting  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Per test case history with insights

    Hello, for the longest time I would like to have more insights into per-test-case data. I would love to have better viewable history of a test-case to see its performance over time. Currently, I have to dig in through every single matrix and piece together the data on my own. I wish Test Lab provided these insights for me. I want to see the health of my tests over time. What is a failure rate for a particular test? As an example metric. Other metrics, how flaky are my tests? Can I see how healthy one particular test by classname has been over the past 6 months? Etc. This is a long-standing wish-list from Test Lab. Other ideas: why can't I query all the recent native crashes that happened? Let me see that in a view. Let me export that data. I just want more insights (bonus: visualizations) and health data :)

    Hello, for the longest time I would like to have more insights into per-test-case data. I would love to have better viewable history of a test-case to see its performance over time. Currently, I have to dig in through every single matrix and piece together the data on my own. I wish Test Lab provided these insights for me. I want to see the health of my tests over time. What is a failure rate for a particular test? As an example metric. Other metrics, how flaky are my tests? Can I see how healthy one particular test by classname… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Test Lab  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. I needed phone number for free

    I need phone number for free

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Test Lab  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating