Skip to content

General

General

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

1216 results found

  1. full support for KMM android, web, ios and desktop.
    What is the point of not supporting all of these?

    we build the best car but you can only use one wheel. Not a great theory for adoption.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Authentication  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. As of this writing, our only option for Database location is US Central, Belgium and Southeast Asia. Having a new region under Australia would be great.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. support using Data Connect in c# and .NET Maui by having SDK for C# and generating C# types from the schema

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Data Connect  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. We have several events with the prefix "Firebase_" for irrelevant reasons. These events were successfully added to Google Analytics by sending them via mParticle.

    We can view statistics for these events, but we cannot use them as goals for A/B tests. The UI displays the following error:
    "Error: Error saving experiment: Can't validate experiment data."
    The server response states:
    "Cannot use reserved event name: '<event name>'."

    The suggested workaround is to create new events with non-reserved names based on these existing events. However, there are limits on the number of events you can create, and this adds unnecessary work.

    Since…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Remote Config  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. When leveraging firebase for OIDC based authentication, there is data loss in mapping of standard user profile attributes between IdP and app such as given name, family name and other attributes as specified in the standard specifications[1]. Firebase auth must implement the specification properly and ensure against data loss.

    [1] https://www.iana.org/assignments/jwt/jwt.xhtml

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Authentication  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Remote config fetched values are not encrypted and it's kept as plain text. Is there any function that can be used to clear this data after a successful fetch? At least we can keep the data safe on our own if there's a way to clear the local file content. I know currently it keeps the last fetched time in the same file but a clear function can clear all values except values like last fetch time. Will be very useful for those who want to use remote config data securely

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Remote Config  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Cloud functions do provide process. env.FIREBASE_CONFIG.

    One can set it in the yaml, but it would be nice if app hosting would provide these automatically.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  App Hosting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Support submodules for automated builds.

    Currently, builds fail when checking out submodules.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  App Hosting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. The issue I am encountering is quite unusual. It arises whenever we try to access storage, even though I am using App Check and Firebase authentication is not required. Our App Check setup appears to be functioning correctly, and we can fetch data without any problems. However, these errors still appear in the console. This issue is occurring only in the Android, while the iOS works fine.

    Console error:
    error getting token java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: com.google.firebase.internal.api.FirebaseNoSignedInUserException: Please sign in before trying to get a token.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. adding a function like FieldValue.serverTimestamp() that does the same thing but assigns time in epoch format rather than in normal date time format.

    it may be a better choice in order to reduce the data transfer and document collection size.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Currently there is no way to customize the email sent to users who authenticate via email (deep ?) link. I understand / accept the rational for this.

    For Firebase projects with multiple Apps, this leads to all authentication emails having a single title (and link) based on the "public-facing name" set in "Project settings". It would be good to have an option to use the "app nickname" used for each of the Apps within the project to form the basis for the email title + link text. This would give users more confidence that they've received a valid login email…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Authentication  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. A document always maintain createdAt / updatedAt timestamp value internally. But these fields can't be used for ordering documents.

    For example :-

    (This is possible)

    await citiesRef.orderBy('name').limit(3).get();

    (This is NOT possible)

    await citiesRef.orderBy('created_at').limit(3).get();

    Currently if we need order by timestamp, we need to maintain a separate timestamp field alongside internal createdAt / updatedAt fields. Then create index over that additional field to perform order by timestamp.

    Similar to name sentinel, firestore should provide created_at and updated_at sentinel for ordering document. These sentinel should work without any new index, ascending or descending order.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Right now the SDK generated only has init with decoder.

    public init(from decoder: any Decoder)

    This limits us in generating the Previews for the views. Please consider adding additional inits with all variables in the struct

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Data Connect  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. What feature would you like to see?
    I would like to see Firebase add official support for the Linux platform. This enhancement would allow developers to build applications that leverage Firebase services natively on Linux, enabling broader platform compatibility and empowering Linux-based applications.

    Why would it be useful?
    Adding Linux support would:

    Enable developers to integrate Firebase services directly into Linux-based applications.
    Provide parity with other supported platforms (e.g., iOS, Android, Web).
    Open up Firebase's powerful features (e.g., authentication, cloud storage, Firestore) to a growing user base on Linux desktop and server environments.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Currently, we can create backends, but there is no option to modify imported GitHub repositories. If making such modifications isn't possible, it would be beneficial to at least have the option to delete the backend.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  App Hosting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. I'm using Go client, and at this time UUIDs are represented as array of numbers. This doesn't make any sense and is quite clunky and unergonomic, but this is the client behaviour - the Go type [16]byte converts to that, and there is no way to affect it directly.

    This also means that a list of UUIDs is impossible to represent at all, since a Go slice converts into an array, and Firestore can't handle arrays in arrays. Btw, that by itself is ridiculous, but right now my problem is with UUIDs specifically.

    A list of IDs is a trivial…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Firestore  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. When working with Firestore databases, you may want to restore an entire database for testing in your stage project.

    However, currently, you can only restore in the same project

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Add an option for the password policy to require users to create a new, unique password that has never been used for their accounts.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Authentication  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?