1220 results found

1. Robo de mis billetera google

   Robo de datos personales

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  App Check  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Allow cross-project restoring of Firestore databases

   When working with Firestore databases, you may want to restore an entire database for testing in your stage project.

   However, currently, you can only restore in the same project

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Transactions should allow exponential backoff retries like pub sub

   Transactions allow passing an options object with maxRetries, but all retries are immediate. If there are many other functions writing the same document, transactions will fail after all retries (lock will time out). Maybe a better strategy would be to delay with exponential backoff like pub sub does.

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   2 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Tell people that mixing V1 and V2 config files in the same project will create a port and container error.

   Tell people that mixing V1 and V2 config files in the same project (note: even outside the gen2 function) will create a port and container error. Right now you don't mention in the docs or anywhere that having ANY function.config files in a project with a gen 2 function will cause a deploy error that says a container is broken and the port is unreachable. This error is misleading. It will also show the gen 2 function in the console as "unknown trigger" which also is misleading.

   In all your documentation you say you can have gen1 and gen2 functions in the same project, but you don't warn people that using function.config configs OUTSIDE of the gen2 functions will still kill the deploy. This makes mixing gen 1 and gen2 functions essentially impossible for anyone who uses gen1 config variables, which is probably most people.

   A quick google search will show that many people have this problem so the error should either be fixed or it should be noted in the upgrade documentation.

   Tell people that mixing V1 and V2 config files in the same project (note: even outside the gen2 function) will create a port and container error. Right now you don't mention in the docs or anywhere that having ANY function.config files in a project with a gen 2 function will cause a deploy error that says a container is broken and the port is unreachable. This error is misleading. It will also show the gen 2 function in the console as "unknown trigger" which also is misleading.

   In all your documentation you say you can have gen1 and gen2 functions… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Cloud Functions for Firebase  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Security Rules: unique() operator

   I am submitting a feature request to introduce a 'unique()' operator in Firestore's security rules, offering a streamlined method to enforce data uniqueness within collections. This operator would not only simplify validation and potentially reduce reads by leveraging Firestore's hidden index table, but also eliminate the need for a separate cloud function, similar to the 'get()' and 'exists()' operations.

   Background:

   At present, ensuring data uniqueness in Firestore often requires workarounds that are less than optimal and can impact scalability.

   Feature Proposal:

   The proposed 'unique()' operator would operate much like the 'exists()' operation, but with a focus on reading Firestore's concealed index table. This efficient approach would verify the uniqueness of specified fields within collections.

   Comparison to Existing Operations:

   Similar to the 'get()' and 'exists()' operations, the 'unique()' operator would provide developers a straightforward means to validate crucial data points such as usernames, email addresses, and more, all without the need for complex cloud functions.

   Example Usage:

   For instance, to ascertain unique usernames:

   Firestore Security Rules:

   function isUniqueUsername(username) {
     return unique(/databases/$(database)/documents/users, ['username', '==', username]);
   }
   

   Benefits:

   Introducing the 'unique()' operator not only simplifies the validation process and leverages the hidden index table but also eliminates the requirement for an additional cloud function. This comprehensive approach enhances Firestore's performance while maintaining developer-friendly functionalities.

   Conclusion:

   By implementing the 'unique()' operator, Firestore could effectively address the challenge of maintaining data uniqueness while offering a holistic solution that eliminates the need for cloud functions.

   Thank you for considering this feature request. I'm optimistic about the significant value it could add to Firestore and our development workflows.

   I am submitting a feature request to introduce a 'unique()' operator in Firestore's security rules, offering a streamlined method to enforce data uniqueness within collections. This operator would not only simplify validation and potentially reduce reads by leveraging Firestore's hidden index table, but also eliminate the need for a separate cloud function, similar to the 'get()' and 'exists()' operations.

   Background:

   At present, ensuring data uniqueness in Firestore often requires workarounds that are less than optimal and can impact scalability.

   Feature Proposal:

   The proposed 'unique()' operator would operate much like the 'exists()' operation, but with a focus on reading Firestore's concealed… more

   26 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   3 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. provide feedback on database restore progress

   During a restore, there's no way to know how long it will take or where the progress is. It would be great to have some visibility into the process.

   I initiated a restore from a backup created by the automated schedules

   gcloud alpha firestore databases restore \
   --source-backup=projects/PROJECTID/locations/LOCATION/backups/BACKUPID \
   --destination-database='DATABASE_ID'

   I have seen this take between 20 minutes to over a day.

   The documentation for this feature is here:

   https://cloud.google.com/firestore/docs/backups

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Support for web apps in Crashlytics
   62 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   5 comments  ·  Crashlytics  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Allow customization of email template message
   64 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   3 comments  ·  Authentication  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Jendo

   Menarik

   0 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   2 comments  ·  App Hosting  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Support reCAPTCHA Enterprice Multi-factor authentication

    AppCheck fail of low score reCaptcha

    user can't access based on AppCheck fail of low score reCaptcha

    reCAPTCHA Enterprice support Multi-factor authentication (Conditionally enforce email multi-factor authentication for users who score below a threshold.) but AppCheck does not.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  App Check  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Should add basic REDIS/ Memcache Like Capability

    Why I Want This?

    Firebase splits functions to individual Docker Container. This works great for scaling, but with that it is not easy to share global values, for example, user's access key to external services and session specific values.

    While we can use REDIS and such hosted on GCP, it would be more "batteries included" platform if this feature is offered as a built-in functionality for the functions without resorting to Firestore or RTDB.

    What I look for is to globally share key values and also auto-expire them.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Cloud Functions for Firebase  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Console give Node.js snippets in ESM standard (it has been around since 2014) rather than CommonJS standard
    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Firebase console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Sub Collection View

    I feel the window to view sub collection on the firebase firestore console could be expandable.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Cloud Functions for Firebase  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Blazor in App Hosting ?

    Any plan to support Blazor and other non js framework

    Or is it already possible by custom integration?

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  App Hosting  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. the sms quota for this project has been exceedded exceeded quota

    Those shiit gringos to everything they see him money

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Support deleting collections in the API

    Currently you can only delete collections programmatically via the CLI. Otherwise, you have to list and delete every single document in the collection. If those documents have nested collections, you have to (recursively) retrieve and delete every document in the nested collection (As deleting a document does not delete any nested collections the document has). If there are additional levels of nested collections... You get the idea.

    I wasn't sure what this other request was referring to so I made this one: https://firebase.uservoice.com/forums/948424-general/suggestions/46562317-api-support-for-deleting-directories

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. AI suggestions in FCM notifications

    AI suggests the body for a notification that I'm writing in the Firebase console, based on a notification title that I provide or a text that I write in natural language.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gemini in Firebase  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Unique password option for password policy

    Add an option for the password policy to require users to create a new, unique password that has never been used for their accounts.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Authentication  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Native Swift implementation of the Real-time database client

    The current Swift client for the Real-time database is written in Objective-C with a Swift overlay.
    In order to allow using Firebase from Swift across different platforms like Windows and Linux, it would be awesome with a native Swift version. Alternatively a Swift version bridged directly from the firebase-cpp-sdk using the new Swift C++ interoperability.

    I did a port of the Objective-C code to Swift as an experiment, and I have it running on Linux just fine - together with the Auth-rewrite in Swift.

    The (very experimental) PR is here: https://github.com/firebase/firebase-ios-sdk/pull/8670

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Firestore: Use C++ implementation directly from Swift

    Swift has recently gained direct interoperability with C++.
    
    This would allow the current bridging layer written in Objective-C++ to be removed, which would in turn make it possible to use Firestore from Swift cross platform.

    The Browser Company have created patches for firebase-cpp-sdk to allow this:

    https://github.com/thebrowsercompany/swift-firebase

    It could also decrease the maintenance burden by removing the bridging layer code.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Firestore  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating