Skip to content

General

General

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

16 results found

  1. Currently Remote Config can be sniffered and there is no option to configure protection from "man in the middle attacks" in client side.
    The best solution is to add support of Certificate Transparency.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Remote Config  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. For the Remote Config REST API, the documentation is fairly ugly around how to go about safely getting a valid ID token for a user to be able to use it. I'm suggesting you put the Remote Config API behind a set of user rules, similar to other Firebase technologies. If that cannot happen for some reason, then one of two things should:

    1. There should be some sort of option in Remote Config or Authentication to automatically give new users a valid credential that allows them to only retrieve the Remote Config (perhaps it automatically creates a Service Worker Account…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. It's really nice to see Remote Config to come to the servers.

    For us it would be crucial to be able to use conditions in Remote Config on the server as well.

    Specifically we are looking at targeting by user properties (these could maybe be loaded and passed by us during evaluation).

    e.g. serverTemplate.evaluate({userProperties: { .. } })

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Why not increase the file size for remote config? Right now it only holds 1MB of text, but if you zip a 1MB plain text file you can reduce it to 100kb or less. So, why not increase the configuration size to 10MB?

    1MB remoteconfig.json ==> compress file ==> 80kb remoteconfig.zip

    10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Provide a native emulator for Remote Config with A/B tests will be great, but is not critical.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Unfortunately it seems impossible to determine on client side whether user is involved to test or in which group he is. It will be great to receive such data along with the value.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Remote Config  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. We currently have a Crash-free users metric, but we don't have a metric to track ANRs. This makes it impossible to validate a fix for ANRs or detect regressions.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Remote Config  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. This would allow developers to find out if a certain feature is causing a terrible user experience for a small group of users, despite not showing up in top level metrics.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. A/B Testing is limited to 24 simultaneous experiments. I want to run more experiment. How to increase the limit for concurrent experiment. Also I want to target all the users in same experiment (App= Android & iOS)

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Create Firebase A/B Testing Experiments through Firebase API or Firebase SDK

    Please provide some provision to create A/B testing experiments programmatically. Apart from Firebase console, it is good to create A/B testing experiments through API or SDK or any other way?

    Please check.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. use remote config firebase API to open remote config AB tests in an easy way from in house systems.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Remote Config is extremely powerful, but to have the same features for server-side feature flagging and A/B testing we have to use something like LaunchDarkly which is a. Expensive b. Another set of SDK & libraries to add to both frontend and backend.

    Where Firebase provides remote config, A/B testing, and personalization with the power of Google Analytics and Google's ML capability I think it's obvious Remote config Admin SDK will provide a significant benefit. Since analytics and remote config is already used in frontend it's a no-brainer to add them to the backend and provide a seamless end-to-end user…

    42 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Real time fetches are currently supported for all platforms except the Javascript SDK. I'd like to be able to fetch in real time across all of my apps: iOS, Android, and Web.

    13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. It would be great to be able to have different remote config configurations (e.g. feature flags) for different preview channels.
    This is important to be even able to use/test/QA the preview channel build if we don't want to rollout the feature globally yet (mostly in the last stages of development).

    Note: For native apps we solved this by using specific version numbers (that are used only for preview builds), but for web apps the version condition is greyed out.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Currently, Firebase allows A/B testing to be created on the remote config parameter with the optimization metric on any event being fired on the Firebase Analytics. Unfortunately, it does not allow the metric to be one of the event_params sent on that event. This limits us in running refined experiments on certain attributes.

    Secondly, A/B testing and conditional rollout do not allow the creation of refined conditions on the basis of event parameters. This limits further in creating rolling out a feature in controlled manner

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. It would be useful to allow creating A/B tests based on Remote Config for the web platform, since Google Optimize is going to be sunset later this year.

    56 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?