776 results found
-
54 votes
-
native
nativePollOnce should be excluded from ANR in Firebase
1 vote -
Admin SDK send email verification
Currently, sending email verification is done through the client-side sdk. There is no method (to my knowledge) for sending email verification via the Admin SDK in a server environment.
The only workaround seems to be the "generateEmailVerificationLink" function but that requires the use of a custom email service. This is different from the client-sdk functionality.
The use case is SSR focused apps where user creation is also done via the Admin SDK and/or where support for no-js availability is a requirement.
1 vote -
我在Google开发者平台提交技术支持抛出"Error submitting request. Please try again later."错误，致使我无法寻求帮助。
我在Google开发者平台提交技术支持抛出"Error submitting request. Please try again later."错误，致使我无法寻求帮助。我不知道为什么会这样.....
1 vote -
51 votes
-
49 votes
-
51 votes
-
Fee/Pricing
Functions is behind paywall, (it is still free for some limit in Blaze plan), but IF i upgrade to Blaze, then Cloud Storage, Hosting etc starts to charge right away, even in free plan they have free limits but once switched to Blaze it starts to charge. So to get free Functions, i have to pay cloud storage and hosting and more.
For any playground project that is not gonna hit market or earn money, how i am supposed to try/learn functions? This forces me to move away from platform
5 votes -
Allow SMS customization & add Web OTP support
Web OTP support increased phone authorization conversion significantly.
Currently, We are not able to customize SMS messages to comply
https://developer.chrome.com/en/articles/web-otp/#format46 votes -
Multi-line strings when A/B testing
In firebase remote config you can have a multi-line string (ie have new lines), but as far as I can tell this isn't possible when setting up the variant in an A/B test this means we can't make small A/B test changes to multi-line text
1 vote -
Security key/WebAuthn 2FA
Currently, we only have the option to use TOTP 2fa or SMS. Security keys are quickly gaining popularity, as it is a more secure option. Please add this.
2 votes -
Tell people that mixing V1 and V2 config files in the same project will create a port and container error.
Tell people that mixing V1 and V2 config files in the same project (note: even outside the gen2 function) will create a port and container error. Right now you don't mention in the docs or anywhere that having ANY function.config files in a project with a gen 2 function will cause a deploy error that says a container is broken and the port is unreachable. This error is misleading. It will also show the gen 2 function in the console as "unknown trigger" which also is misleading.
In all your documentation you say you can have gen1 and gen2 functions…
2 votes -
Projecct ID can be change
I wish that there is at least one chance to change the project id because some times we choose random names just to test our project then we make it as production and in this state we cant change the random name we choose before
3 votes -
Blazor in App Hosting ?
Any plan to support Blazor and other non js framework
Or is it already possible by custom integration?
3 votes -
Expand auth blocking functions
Support some additional data sent during the
signInWithEmailAndPasswordthat can be read in thebeforeCreate3 votes -
Make it possible to block/disable services
For security, I would like to be able to completely disable functions in my account. So nothing can be done without an extra authentication (e.g. admin password).
This to prevent large bills due to errors in the software or due to bad actors. Especially since this whole Google Cloud is completely connected to Firebase, the risk of a mistake or a bad actor is higher
1 vote -
5 emails
I saw this on the documentation website: "Note: The limits for email link sign-in emails were recently changed. Please add a billing instrument to go beyond 5 email link sign-in emails."
It's really strange that you quietly set the limit of sign-in emails to 5. Why? It makes no sense. For testing it's too low, and for production of course.
First you hook developers up to Firebase and then you quietly lower the limits. Good business practices.
1 vote -
Support deleting collections in the API
Currently you can only delete collections programmatically via the CLI. Otherwise, you have to list and delete every single document in the collection. If those documents have nested collections, you have to (recursively) retrieve and delete every document in the nested collection (As deleting a document does not delete any nested collections the document has). If there are additional levels of nested collections... You get the idea.
I wasn't sure what this other request was referring to so I made this one: https://firebase.uservoice.com/forums/948424-general/suggestions/46562317-api-support-for-deleting-directories
7 votes -
Support adaptive app icons
Android 8.0 (API level 26) introduced adaptive app icons, which are made out of background and foreground layer. Apps that have minSDK = 26 don't have to specify "flat" PNG icons. However, App Distribution doesn't support adaptive app icons, and as a result weird icon with cropped app name is displayed in the App Tester app. App Distribution should support adaptive app icons by parsing icon XML, obtaining foreground and background assets, and based on this render the icon.
6 votes -
Support Go in Cloud Functions
Go is much more efficient than Python or Js and should be the obvious choice for backend where performance is crucial
34 votes
- Don't see your idea?